Australian Government - click here to go to our home page

go to start   text resizing

Australian Public Service Commission
Employment policy and advice - Click to go to the Publications page

related resources

on our site

news

Home page
> Publications > Better, Faster: streamlining recruitment in the APS > The argument for redesign > Next: Process mapping methodology
> Employment policy and advice
‹ Previous page

Last updated: 9 August 2007

Better, Faster: streamlining recruitment in the APS

Section 1: The argument for redesign

Current recruitment processes are costing us

In the search for quality staff, agencies across the Australian Public Service (APS) are spending heavily. Advertising is becoming bigger, brighter, more creative and innovative. Reputations such as being a great place to work, commitment to staff wellbeing and family friendly and flexible policies are being extensively promoted.

This investment, however, is being undermined by poor internal recruitment practices. From the candidate’s perspective, the recruitment process provides an insight into what it might be like to work for an organisation.

In the 2005/06 State of the Service Employee Survey:

Given the competition for great candidates, agencies that are able to attract larger pools of quality applicants, who can move quickly, and who use more reliable selection processes will have the pick of the bunch.

Are your current recruitment processes working in your best interest? Or are they potential barriers to candidates?

Efficient timeline
Recruitment need identified Vacancy advertised Advertising closed Shortlisting complete Selection process undertaken Verbal offer made New recruit commences    
Day 1 Day 10 Day 24 Day 25 Day 30 Day 31 Day 45    
Inefficient timeline
Recruitment need identified Vacancy advertised   Advertising closed   Shortlisting complete Selection process undertaken Verbal offer made New recruit commences
Day 1 Day 12   Day 26   Day 32 Day 45 Day 59 Day 88

Average APS recruitment times (and targets)

Did you know that agencies have reported the following average  recruitment times for an individual recruitment exercise?

With rigorous planning, it is possible to significantly reduce recruitment time, particularly from the candidate’s perspective, without radically  changing process. Agencies should consider targets such as the following:

Milestone Average Target  
Time from identification of recruitment need to advertising 12 days 10 days  
Time from date of advertising to verbal offer made 47 days 21 days > ‘The candidate experience’
Time from verbal offer made to new starter commencing 29 days 14 days
Total time for recruitment activity 88 days 45 days  
Number of steps in recruitment process 53 40  
Number of people involved in recruitment process 11 6  

Remember, we are not only competing with each other, but with the private sector.

‘Current APS recruitment processes are potential barriers to attracting and selecting high quality candidates’
Lynelle Briggs
Australian Public Service Commissioner

Ideally, a process should be run efficiently from start to finish, but the most critical aspects to get right are those visible to the candidate, i.e. from advertising to offer.

Maintaining contact with the successful candidate will also be critical after the offer is made and where security clearances are required. Time spent obtaining security clearances is often extensive and can result in losing good candidates.

Four keys to efficient recruitment outcomes

  1. Strip away unnecessary steps from the recruitment process.
  2. Provide managers with structure and support to complete the task quickly and effectively.
  3. Encourage managers to recognise that recruitment is a priority in its own right and not something that is ‘fitted in’ after finishing their regular work.
  4. Clearly communicate organisational expectations (and measures) in respect to recruitment activity and ensure they are understood.

‘All APS agencies will identify and adopt strategies for making their recruitment processes more accessible and attractive to potential recruits’
Management Advisory Committee, Managing and Sustaining the APS Workforce, 2005